UFT leadership argued that our members should not have the right to strike - that we're better off without it. I analyze why here. Repost from the New Action / UFT blog. https://newaction.org/
A provision of the Taylor Law is the penalty of losing past contractual obligations including health care, working hours etc. You would have to start from scratch again at the bargaining table. Part of past strike settlements included retaining contract but there's no guarantee the city would. Be careful.you
A provision of the Taylor Law is the penalty of losing past contractual obligations including health care, working hours etc. You would have to start from scratch again at the bargaining table. Part of past strike settlements included retaining contract but there's no guarantee the city would. Be careful.you
Yes, we'd want to hold onto the good parts of the Taylor Law, but amendments are needed. The anti-strike clauses are draconian.